The Lines Between the Lines:
How Stage Directions Affect Embodiment

The Lines Between the Lines book cover

The Lines Between the Lines book cover

The first full length study focused on how stage directions function and why they matter to the reading and performance of play scripts.

What is the purpose of a stage direction? These italicized lines written in between the lines of spoken dialogue tell us a great deal of information about a play's genre, mood, tone, visual setting, cast of characters, and more. Yet generations of actors have been taught to cross these words out as records of previous performances or signs of overly controlling playwrights, while scholars have either treated them as problems to be solved or as silent lines of dialogue. Stage directions can be all of these things, and yet there are examples from over one-hundred years of American playwriting that show that stage directions can also be so much more. The Lines Between the Lines focuses on how playwrights have written stage directions that engage readers, production team members, and scholars in a process of embodied creation in order to determine meaning. Author Bess Rowen calls the products of this method “affective stage directions” because they reach out from the page and affect the bodies of those who encounter them. Affective stage directions do not tell a reader or production team what a given moment looks like, but rather how a moment feels. In this way, these stage directions provide playgrounds for individual readers or production teams to make sense of a given moment in a play based on their own individual cultural experience, geographic location, and identity-markers. Affective stage directions enable us to check our assumptions about what kinds of bodies are represented on stage, allowing for a greater multitude of voices and kinds of embodied identity to make their own interpretations of a play while still following the text exactly. The tools provided in this book are as useful for the theater scholar as they are for the theater audience member, casting director, and actor. Each chapter covers a different function of stage directions (spoken, affective, choreographic, multivalent, impossible) and looks at it through a different practical lens (focusing on actors, directors, designers, dramaturgs, and readers). Every embodied person will have a slightly different understanding of affective stage directions, and it is precisely this diversity that makes these stage directions crucial to understanding theater in our time.

The Reviewers Engage with the Book:

“Engages an incredibly rich and under-explored topic, and extends the existing literature on the subject in significant and meaningful ways. The book is chock full of really outstanding case studies and close readings... It will be a go-to text for writing about dramatic secondary text."

Ryan Claycomb, Colorado State University

"An important and exciting topic for a book. Rowen has pulled together an inspiring archive of texts that provoke all kinds of questions about this underacknowledged form of theatrical inscription and I found myself constantly engaged by the examples that she draws on.”

Daniel Sack, University of Massachusetts Amherst

“Rowen consistently models a scrupulous and innovative method for reading affective stage directions, and the field would be wise to take up her invitation to extend the work beyond this book’s thoughtfully defined parameters. So, too, would twenty-first-century theater artists who feel compelled by but also frustrated with O’Neill and his plays. As Rowen shows, the author’s copious stage directions can provide them with opportunities to exercise a creative authority that is all their own.”

Jennifer Buckley, The Eugene O’Neill Review

“One of the many strengths of this thoughtful study is Rowen’s decisive decentring of assumptions of whiteness in American theatre and theatre studies. […] This timely investigation, which re-frames our historical and contemporary understandings of the roles that stage directions play in affecting all bodies that encounter them, establishes a productive path forward for those who write, embody, and analyse stage direction. It rightfully recognizes affective stage directions as tools that prompt creative, inclusive choices in both imagined and staged performances and establishes the groundwork for future studies on the relationship between affect and embodiment on stage.”

Kaitlyn Farrell Rodriguez, Modern Drama

“Working deftly through a variety of theoretical perspectives, particularly semiotics, performativity, and affect theory, Rowen opens up a purportedly boring, possibly constraining, and always imperative aspect of scripts and illustrates its radical potential for multiplicity and fanciful engagement. [...] With Rowen's scintillating excurses on the role of stage directions in producing plays, let the playground open, let the play begin."

Tison Pugh, The Tennessee Williams Annual Review

"The Lines Between Lines is a richly valuable new interrogation of a still somewhat under-explored element of theatre practice and scholarship. [...] [T]his is nevertheless a satisfying, wide-ranging yet focused text, and one that promises to properly advance our thinking about stage directions and their various permutations. Or, as Rowen puts it, it is a book that offers the reader ‘new approaches to these stage directions that recontextualize them as sites of performance potential and possibility as opposed to markers of unperformable plays’ (p. 22)."

Hannah Simpson, The Year's Work in Critical and Cultural Theory

“In an ambitious project that bridges theoretical analysis and practical application, Bess Rowen considers the significance and importance of stage directions within the theatrical text in The Lines between the Lines: How Stage Directions Affect Embodiment. Tracing the evolution of stage directions from the twentieth century on, Rowen argues that stage directions offer a path toward interrogating the cultural processes of theatre to challenge, subvert, and transform how we think about representation.”

Catherine Heiner, Journal of Dramatic Theory & Criticism